You are not logged in
You need to be a member to print this page.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.
Find out more about our membership benefits
Authors:
Eoin O’Brien
The evidence for ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) as an indispensable investigation in clinical practice is now overwhelming. For years the argument against ABPM has been based on a lack of evidence showing the technique was superior to conventional measurement in predicting outcome. There is now ample evidence from longitudinal studies that ABPM is a much stronger predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than conventional measurement.1 Moreover, though the relevance of nocturnal hypertension has been a controversial topic, recent evidence has shown that a non-dipping nocturnal pattern is a strong independent risk for cardiovascular mortality.
There are currently no comments for this article - leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not yet a member? Register now for free.
You need to be a member to print this page.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.
Find out more about our membership benefits
You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.
Find out more about our membership benefits