Please login or register to print this page.

The British Journal
of Cardiology

This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

The Clinical Standards Board for Scotland’s quality assurance system in secondary prevention following acute myocardial infarction

September 2003    Volume 10, Issue 5   Br J Cardiol 2003;10:386-91

Authors:
Marion Barlow, Rona Smith, Sarah Wedgwood

The Clinical Standards Board for Scotland (CSBS) was established in 1999 to develop a national system of quality assurance and accreditation of clinical services with the aim of promoting public confidence in the NHS in Scotland (NHSS). The coronary heart disease pathfinder project assessed services to patients following myocardial infarction. The quality assurance system involves comparison of performance against written standards developed by a multidisciplinary project group which included lay members. Six nationally applicable standards were the subject of comprehensive open consultation with both the public and the professions. All acute trusts in Scotland were issued with a self-assessment tool followed by a visit from a multidisciplinary external review team comprising of lay representatives and health service professionals who produced a verbal and written report. There was a pool of over 100 reviewers and each team numbered on average eight reviewers, two of whom were lay members. A national report of Scotland’s performance was published by CSBS in October 2001.
The main areas of concern in Scotland’s national performance were that few sites were able to meet the standard relating to thrombolysis times and there was an overall lack of robust audit material. It was noted, however, that the major strength of Scotland’s delivery of healthcare lay with the staff providing services.
The process of accreditation in Scotland differs from that of other countries and one of its strengths lies in the involvement of the public, patients and health professionals as peers in all stages. The process itself encouraged dissemination of good practice and highlighted areas of concern.

In the near future, you will need to be a registered user to view full articles

Already a member? Login now

Register Now

Close

back to top

Comments

There are currently no comments for this article - leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not yet a member? Register now for free.

back to top

Close

You are not logged in

You need to be a member to print this page.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.

Find out more about our membership benefits

Close

You are not logged in

You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.

Find out more about our membership benefits