Please login or register to print this page.

The British Journal
of Cardiology

This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Evaluation of left ventricular non-compaction using multi-detector computed tomography

July 2009    Volume 16, Issue 4   Br J Cardiol 2009;16:199–200

Authors:
Edward T D Hoey, Nicholas J Screaton, Bobby S K Agrawal, Matthew J Daniels, Andrew A Grace, Deepa Gopalan

Edward T D Hoey
Cardiothoracic Imaging Fellow, Department of Radiology

Nicholas J Screaton
Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology

Bobby S K Agrawal
Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology

Matthew J Daniels
Speciality Registrar, Department of Cardiology

Andrew A Grace
Consultant Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology

Dr Deepa Gopalan
Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology

Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB3 8RE

Correspondence to:
Dr D Gopalan
Deepa.Gopalan2@papworth.nhs.uk

A 37-year-old man presented with palpitations and recurrent episodes of pre-syncope. He had a past medical history of atrial septal defect (ASD) repair aged seven.

At age 16, he started to suffer with recurrent attacks of pre-syncope and a 24-hour tape documented runs of broad complex tachycardia for which he was commenced on sotalol and fitted with a single-chamber rate-responsive pacing system. Electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission showed an unusual pattern of right bundle branch block, extreme left axis deviation and first-degree heart block. Transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated biventricular dilatation, moderately impaired left ventricular systolic function and prominent trabeculations, which raised the suspicion of left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). Interestingly, his twin brother also had an ASD repair in childhood, suffered with recurrent syncopal episodes and was fitted with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) at age 36 following documented ventricular tachycardia. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was precluded due to the pacemaker and ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) was instead performed. This showed increased ventricular trabeculations along the apical and mid-ventricular segments of the anterior and lateral walls (figures 1 and 2). The coronary arteries were normal and functional analysis showed regional wall motion abnormality with an estimated ejection fraction of 44%. The CT appearances were consistent with a diagnosis of LVNC. He was treated with ICD implantation and both he and his brother remain well.

Figure 1. Computed tomography (CT) sagittal reconstruction, two-chamber view. The subepicardial myocardium is thin and normally compacted with a thicker non-compacted subendocardial layer in the anterior wall and apex. Note the artefact from the right ventricular (RV) pacemaker tip

Figure 1. Computed tomography (CT) sagittal reconstruction, two-chamber view. The subepicardial myocardium is thin and normally compacted with a thicker non-compacted subendocardial layer in the anterior wall and apex. Note the artefact from the right ventricular (RV) pacemaker tip

Figure 2. CT five-chamber view again showing prominent trabeculations along the lateral and anteroapical wall of the left ventricle

Figure 2. CT five-chamber view again showing prominent trabeculations along the lateral and anteroapical wall of the left ventricle

Discussion

LVNC is a rare congenital cardiomyopathy caused by an arrest of myocardial morphogenesis. Imaging studies reveal a dilated hypocontractile left ventricle, which has a two-layered wall. The subepicardial myocardium is thin and normally compacted with a thicker non-compacted subendocardial layer. A ratio of non-compacted:compacted myocardium greater than 2:1 is considered diagnostic. Prompt recognition of LVNC is mandatory because of its clinical manifestations, which include heart failure, thromboembolic events and ventricular arrhythmias. CMR is the imaging modality of choice for LVNC with a high diagnostic accuracy. It provides clear delineation of the extent of non-compaction and also helps distinguish pathological LVNC from lesser degrees of trabeculation, which may be seen in healthy subjects. CMR is, however, contraindicated in patients with a pacemaker or other implanted electrical device. There have been tremendous advances in CT technology in recent years with the advent of multi-detector scanners and ECG-gated acquisition. Cardiac CT is widely used for the investigation of coronary artery disease in selected patient groups and can also provide a comprehensive assessment of cardiac morphology. The high spatial resolution of CT can readily demonstrate the prominent trabeculations in cases of LVNC as shown in this case.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

In the near future, you will need to be a registered user to view full articles

Already a member? Login now

Register Now

Close

back to top

Comments

There are currently no comments for this article - leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not yet a member? Register now for free.

back to top

Close

You are not logged in

You need to be a member to print this page.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.

Find out more about our membership benefits

Close

You are not logged in

You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Sign up for free membership, or log in.

Find out more about our membership benefits