Anticoagulation module 4: clinical aspects of anticoagulation

Click any image to enlarge

This module considers the clinical use of anticoagulants: the initiation of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and practical issues around monitoring; the use of non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and their effect on laboratory tests; and interruption of anticoagulation for invasive procedures and in patients undergoing cardioversion. The therapeutic indications for anticoagulants in acute coronary syndromes and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as their use in cardioversion for AF, are covered in module 3, which also considers the choice of anticoagulant for stroke prevention. The use of anticoagulants in heart valve disease is covered in module 7 of our heart valve disease learning programme.

Indications for anticoagulation treatment

Figure 1. The colour-coded doses of warfarin tablets
Figure 1. The colour-coded doses of warfarin tablets

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are effective anticoagulants but have a poor safety profile and were the subject of a National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) alert1 in 2007. They also feature as one of the High Risk Medications in the Patient Safety First campaign in England. The risk of major haemorrhage is 2–5% per year and is higher in the elderly or where other risk factors for bleeding co-exist. Bleeding risk can be estimated using the HAS-BLED score (see module 3). Good anticoagulant management is important in reducing risk. Warfarin is the VKA of choice in the UK and comes in four colour-coded doses (see figure 1).2

The level of anticoagulation is assessed using the International Normalised Ratio, or INR. The INR is derived from the prothrombin time, with a correction to adjust for the sensitivity of each laboratory’s reagents (see below). The INR therefore gives a standardised measure of the degree of anticoagulation with warfarin: it provides consistency between laboratories. The target INR depends on the indication for anticoagulation but for atrial fibrillation (AF) and most non-valvular cardiac conditions it is 2.5 (range 2.0–3.0).

Table 4. Indications for anticoagulant treatment
Table 1. Example indications for anticoagulant treatment. See BCSH guidelines for more detailed information3

Table 1 shows the various indications for anticoagulant treatment, as well as INR target and range and the duration of treatment.

There is great biological variability in response to VKAs. Most of this is genetically determined but there are also many interactions with drugs and foodstuffs. Two common polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 2C9 system are associated with increased warfarin sensitivity, and mutations in the VKORC1 gene complex can cause either sensitivity or resistance to VKAs.

Drugs can interact with warfarin in a number of ways:

  • antibiotics can reduce the synthesis of vitamin K, which is usually performed by gut bacteria
  • some drugs can affect warfarin absorption (e.g. cholestyramine)
  • Inducers or inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 system can have substantial effects on warfarin levels. Commonly-used drugs which can increase warfarin levels include several antibiotics, omeprazole, statins and amiodarone. Over-the-counter remedies can also affect levels (e.g. glucosamine can increase levels, St John’s Wort can reduce levels), as can some foods (e.g. grapefruit and cranberry can increase warfarin levels).

Always consult the full list of potential interactions in the British National Formulary. Great care should be taken when making changes to medication in patients taking warfarin, including more frequent INR checks.

Starting anticoagulation with warfarin

Table 2. Some common drugs interfering with the action of warfarin
Table 2. Some common drugs interfering with the action of warfarin

Anticoagulation should be initiated only when appropriate follow up has been arranged. Frequent checks of the INR are required until the dosage is stabilised, at least twice in the first week, and if the patient is to attend an anticoagulant clinic it is often safer to defer initiation until first attendance at the clinic.

Discuss the risks and benefits of anticoagulation with the patient and ensure they have consented to the treatment. If the patient is a younger woman, check that she is not pregnant or planning pregnancy as warfarin can cause embryopathy between six and 12 weeks gestation.

Figure 2. The yellow Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (OAT) booklet
Figure 2. The yellow Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (OAT) booklet

Check for bleeding history and other medication that may interact with warfarin (see table 2).

Also check baseline INR, full blood count, liver and renal function.

Complete the BSH/NPSA yellow Oral Anticoagulant Therapy card (figure 2) and dosage record (or other appropriate written information) and give this to the patient. Keep separate clinical notes including INR results and dosage.

Ensure the patient understands:

  • the rationale for treatment
  • the importance of regular blood tests
  • variable warfarin doses and tablet strengths
  • what to do and who to contact if bleeding or bruising or any other complications occur
  • the importance of extra checks during periods of intercurrent illness, or when starting or stopping other medication, including self-medication
  • Bruising

  • the teratogenicity of warfarin in pregnancy where appropriate
  • the possible effects of dietary changes and alcohol intake
  • any limitations to sports and leisure activities
  • the importance of informing health care professionals about anticoagulant use.

The effectiveness of warfarin hinges on its effects on vitamin K levels. Increasing the amount of vitamin K by eating more broccoli can make warfarin less effective.

Warfarin induction regimes

Rapid induction regimes are not suitable for out-patient or community use as they require daily INR checks. They are more likely to result in very high INR values or warfarin-induced skin necrosis caused by steep falls in protein C and S levels.

BruisingA suitable regime for patients with AF is the Tait and Sefcick algorithm.4* This uses a 5 mg dose of warfarin for the first four days provided the baseline INR is no greater than 1.4 and the patient is not on amiodarone, in which case 3 or 4 mg should be the initial dose and the dose adjustments modified. Other risk factors such as age >80 years, heart failure, liver disease or other bleeding risk should also prompt a reduced starting dose. INR checks are carried out twice weekly for the first two weeks at least.

*The Tait and Sefcick induction protocol provides a warfarin induction regimen for outpatient anticoagulation. In their evaluation, the authors found this regimen safer and more reliable for initiation of anticoagulation than a standard 10 mg regimen, with fewer patients having INRs above the safe therapeutic range. For further details on initiating anticoagulation, please consult the current British National Formulary (BNF), and see the British Journal of Haematology guidelines on oral anticoagulation.3

Patients requiring cardioversion

These patients should have a therapeutic INR (>2.0) for at least three weeks before and four weeks after cardioversion to reduce the risk of embolisation. INR checks should be performed at least weekly during this period. As INR values do tend to fluctuate it is useful to aim for target INR between 2.5 and 3.0 to avoid dips below 2.0 that result in cancellation of the procedure.

Table 3. Bleeding and high INR on warfarin
Table 3. Bleeding and high INR on warfarin

If the patient has been in AF for a short period only, and cardioversion is performed after transoesphageal echocardiography has shown no evidence of intra-atrial thrombus, anticoagulation is not mandatory.

High INR values and bleeding in warfarinised patients

The British Committee for Standards in Haematology Guidelines on oral anticoagulation with warfarin (4th edition)3 has guidance on high INR and bleeding to which the reader is directed for more complete information (see also table 3). This is provided for educational purposes only – specialist advice should always be sought when required.

Interruption of anticoagulation for invasive procedures

For dental procedures, including extraction, warfarin should not be stopped, but the INR should be <4.0. Other low risk procedures, such as skin biopsy and endoscopy, without biopsy can also be performed without stopping warfarin.

If a reduction in INR to <1.5 is required, warfarin should be stopped three to five days (depending on INR and target range) before the procedure. Depending on thrombotic risk, (including CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score), bridging anticoagulation with heparin or low molecular weight heparin may be advisable. This is a specialist area and it is best to seek advice from a haematologist for an appropriate regime, especially if the patient has any history of thrombotic events.

Self testing

Figure 4. CoaguChek® XS system
Figure 3. CoaguChek® XS system

There are a number of reliable INR monitors available that use capillary blood samples and are suitable for home INR testing. The CoaguChek® XS (see figure 3) has built in quality control material and gives good correlation with venous blood samples in patients who are stably anticoagulated. Patients on long-term anticoagulation may wish to purchase such a machine. The disposables required can be provided on NHS prescription. Patients who wish to self-test or self-manage should discuss this with their anticoagulant clinic before purchase of a machine, and should remain under the overall care of an anticoagulant service or their GP. The performance of the machine should be checked in the clinic every six months.

Practical issues associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs)

Laboratory measurement of anticoagulant effect

This is not required in routine use. It may, however, be useful in two situations:

  • In bleeding patients, or those requiring urgent surgery, to estimate the amount of drug on board. The results of the basic clotting screen may be helpful here.
  • To monitor anticoagulant effect in certain high-risk patient groups (extremes of body weight, renal impairment, interacting medications). This requires specialist assays.

Routine clotting tests and NOACs

When interpreting the results of screening clotting tests, it is useful to have the coagulation cascade in mind, Figure 4 shows the coagulation cascade, marked to show which bits are tested by the three screening clotting tests: PT (prothrombin time), APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time), and TT (thrombin time).

Figure 4. Coagulation cascade showing parts tested by screening clotting tests
Figure 4. Coagulation cascade showing parts tested by screening clotting tests

As might be predicted from figure 4, and a knowledge of the mechanism of action of NOACS, these anticoagulants may affect the results of screening clotting tests. However, results of these tests with NOACs are not consistent or standardised, and they therefore cannot be used for monitoring of these agents. Perhaps most importantly, results of standard clotting tests can be normal, even at therapeutic levels of anticoagulation with NOACS. Each lab will get different results depending on reagents, and results should be discussed with lab staff or a clinical haematologist. Table 4 is a guide showing the influence of NOACs on screening coagulation tests.3,5

Table 4. Influence of NOACs on screening coagulation tests
Table 4. Influence of NOACs on screening coagulation tests
Table 5. Specialist assays for NOACs
Table 5. Specialist assays for NOACs

For accurate measurement of drug levels, specialist assays have been developed (table 5). These may not be available in all laboratories.

Cessation of NOACs before invasive procedures

This is a confusing area. The manufacturers of each of the NOACs give recommendations, but pharmacokinetic modelling suggests that longer may be needed, especially in patients with impaired renal function, and where ensuring adequate haemostasis is crucial. Bridging anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin is not usually necessary, but might be considered in certain high-risk situations. As ever, decisions should be individualised based on thrombotic and bleeding risk, and specialist advice sought. Table 6 is a guide.

Table 6. Cessation of NOACs before invasive procedures
Table 6. Cessation of NOACs before invasive procedures

Recommendations on drug intake before surgery have also been issued by the European Heart Rhythm Association.8

close window and return to take test

References

1. Patient safety alert 18. National Patient Safety Agency 2007. Available from http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/alerts-and-directives/alerts/anticoagulant/ (accessed 20/02/13)

2. Oral anticoagulant therapy patient information booklet. National Patient Safety Agency 2008. Available from http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?EntryId45=61777 (accessed 20/02/13)

3. Keeling D, Baglin T, Tait C et al. British Committee for Standards in Haematology Guidelines on oral anticoagulation with warfarin – fourth edition. Br J Haematol 2011;154:1365–2141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08753.x

4. Tait RC, Sefcick A. A warfarin induction regimen for out-patient anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Br J Haematol 1998;101:4504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00716.x

5. Dale BJ, Chan NC, Eikelboom JW. Laboratory measurement of the direct oral anticoagulants. Br J Haematol 2015 (published online 22nd October 2015). http://dx.doi.org/1111/bjh.13810

6. Spyropoulos AC, Douketis JD. How I treat anticoagulated patients undergoing an elective procedure or surgery. Blood 2012;120:2954−2962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-06-415943

7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries. Anticoagulation – oral. Available at http://cks.nice.org.uk/anticoagulation-oral (Accessed 5th November 2015)

8. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015;17:1467–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv309

Further reading

Hicks T, Stewart F, Eisinga A. NOACs versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2016;3:e000279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000279

close window and return to take test

All rights reserved. No part of this programme may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers, Medinews (Cardiology) Limited.

It shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent.

Medical knowledge is constantly changing. As new information becomes available, changes in treatment, procedures, equipment and the use of drugs becomes necessary. The editors/authors/contributors and the publishers have taken care to ensure that the information given in this text is accurate and up to date. Readers are strongly advised to confirm that the information, especially with regard to drug usage, complies with the latest legislation and standards of practice.

Healthcare professionals should consult up-to-date Prescribing Information and the full Summary of Product Characteristics available from the manufacturers before prescribing any product. Medinews (Cardiology) Limited cannot accept responsibility for any errors in prescribing which may occur.