Digoxin: a look back and a look forward

Br J Cardiol 2024;31(suppl 3):S3doi:10.5837/bjc.2024.s07 Leave a comment
Click any image to enlarge
Authors:
Statement of support:
This educational supplement has been solely funded by a grant from BTG Pharmaceuticals (a SERB company). BTG were not involved in the development of the programme, content, selection of authors or their arrangements. All content has been independently developed by OmniaMed Communications Limited.

SERB

First published online August 2024

Digoxin is one of the oldest drugs still used in cardiovascular medicine and yet one of the most controversial. Ever since its medical use was popularised by the British physician William Withering in 1785, it has been the subject of lingering debate within the medical community. In this issue of the British Journal of Cardiology, we explore the evolution of this seemingly timeless drug from its historical origins to modern day clinical use.

In the first article, Xanniedes et al. take a look back at the major scientific advances that have led to our current understanding and medical use of digoxin. From ancient wisdom and William Withering’s careful chronicling of the therapeutic benefits and side effects of the common botanical foxglove in dropsy, which still hold true today, to the discovery of its mode of action and eventual rise to become a staple in the management of heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in the pre-angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor era. In parallel, the authors highlight a more macabre side to the digoxin story, including issues with toxicity, disagreements between prominent physicians in the history of medicine, and conflicting evidence of the effect of digoxin on mortality. It is an illuminating story of astute clinical observation, biological discovery and the importance of methodological rigour.

In the second article, Thompson et al. review the major indications and evidence for digoxin use in contemporary clinical practice. The epidemiology, classification, current therapeutic landscape for HF and AF, and the timeline of clinical studies of digoxin are discussed, including remaining evidence gaps. Importantly, the role of prescription bias is highlighted, which may explain the finding of excess mortality associated with digoxin use in selected non-randomised trials. The authors conclude with modern day clinical settings where treatment with digoxin still plays a role and ongoing clinical trials.

In the third article, Andrews and Thompson provide a comprehensive overview of the pharmacological properties of digoxin, including common and less well-recognised side effects. Safe prescribing of digoxin requires knowledge of the narrow therapeutic index and potential interactions with other drugs. Crucially, they outline scenarios that can lead to digoxin toxicity, how this may occur even with a digoxin level within the therapeutic range and provide advice for the successful management of digoxin toxicity.

Since digoxin is still widely used by cardiologists today, the editors hope that this issue of the BJC will provide a useful reminder of why and how digoxin has managed to keep a place within the therapeutic armamentarium of AF and HF and offer practical advice for its contemporary use. Ideally, this compendium will also stimulate further research to determine whether digoxin’s limitations can be overcome, or whether it is finally time for this centuries-old drug to be replaced.

Articles in this supplement

Digitalis – from Withering to the 21st century
The modern-day role of digoxin in heart failure and atrial fibrillation – benefits and limitations
Digoxin: monitoring, limitations of its use, and managing toxicity

Conflicts of interest

RZ has received an honorarium for working on this supplement.

Rosita Zakeri
Senior Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Cardiologist, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Fellow
King’s College London and King’s College Hospital and Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trusts, London

([email protected])

Disclaimer:

Medical knowledge is constantly changing. As new information becomes available, changes in treatment, procedures, equipment and the use of drugs become necessary. The editors/authors/contributors and the publishers Medinews (Cardiology) Ltd have taken care to ensure that the information given in this text is accurate and up to date at the time of publication.

Readers are strongly advised to confirm that the information, especially with regard to drug usage, complies with the latest legislation and standards of practice. Medinews (Cardiology) Limited advises healthcare professionals to consult up-to-date Prescribing Information and the full Summary of Product Characteristics available from the manufacturers before prescribing any product. Medinews (Cardiology) Limited cannot accept responsibility for any errors in prescribing which may occur.

The opinions, data and statements that appear are those of the contributors. The publishers, editors, and members of the editorial board do not necessarily share the views expressed herein. Although every effort is made to ensure accuracy and avoid mistakes, no liability on the part of the publisher, editors, the editorial board or their agents or employees is accepted for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading information.

© Medinews (Cardiology) Ltd 2024. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publishers, Medinews (Cardiology) Ltd. It shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent.

THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO COMMENTS FOR THIS ARTICLE - LEAVE A COMMENT