Clinical articles

We report the case of a 45-year-old man presenting with worsening shortness of breath and chest tightness on a background of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and stable angina. He felt generally unwell and had a productive cough two weeks prior to presentation. Initial examination found quiet heart sounds and reduced air entry bi-basally on auscultation. Electrocardiography (ECG) demonstrating lateral T-wave flattening and ongoing chest tightness directed management towards an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, negative troponin I and positive D-dimer prompted investigation with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) identifying a 3.5 cm thickness pericardial effusion and no pulmonary embolism. Initial COVID-19 nasopharyngeal swabs were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Echocardiography identified features consistent with cardiac tamponade prompting pericardiocentesis. Over 1,000 ml of straw-coloured aspirate was drained with significant clinical improvement, and the patient was discharged with plans for urgent outpatient cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Interestingly, despite multiple negative nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19, serum antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detected.

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention of ischaemic events in coronary artery disease. Some patients, who may be at high bleed risk if other factors are present, should be considered for gastroprotection. In our survey, we assessed whether gastroprotection was prescribed for hospital inpatients, especially high-risk patients, who were receiving dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge, and the type of gastroprotection prescribed. We found that over 13 months, a total of 1,693 patient episodes were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge, of which 71% also received gastroprotection. Of the patient episodes who were not prescribed gastroprotection, 46% (223/483) met the criterion of age as a risk factor for gastroprotection. A further 30 episodes met other risk criteria of certain concomitant drugs or prior comorbidity. There is a need among clinicians and pharmacy teams within the hospital for recognition and management of this opportunity to improve the care of these patients.

We report the case of an elderly woman with recent hip replacement surgery that presented with cardiogenic shock. The initial echocardiogram was suggestive of mid-ventricular Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, which was later confirmed due to absence of severe coronary artery disease and complete resolution of the patient’s cardiac systolic dysfunction. Fluid and inotrope administration in the acute phase, and guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure, thereafter, led to full recovery.

Disparities in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are among the leading health and social care concerns in the UK. The disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic to health services has further placed cardiovascular care and the respective patient communities at the sharp end, not least in exacerbating existing health inequalities across service interfaces and patients’ health outcomes. While the pandemic engenders unprecedented constraints within established cardiology services, it conduces to a unique opportunity to embrace novel transformative approaches within the way we deliver patient care in maintaining best practices during and beyond the crisis. As the first step in navigating toward the ‘new norm’, a clear recognition of the challenges inherent in cardiovascular health inequalities is critical, primarily in preventing the widening of extant inequalities as cardiology workforces continue to build back fairer. We may consider the challenges through the lens of health services’ diverse facets, including the aspects of universality, interconnectivity, adaptability, sustainability, and preventability. This article explores the pertinent challenges and provides a focused narration concerning potential measures to foster equitable and resilient cardiology services that are patient centred in the post-pandemic landscape.

This audit compared the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admitted to a district general hospital (DGH) during comparative eight month periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The periods studied were from 1 February 2019 to 30 September 2019 and between the same dates in 2020. We investigated differences in mortality and patient characteristics (age, gender and new or prior diagnosis). For patients who survived to discharge and who were not referred to palliative care, we also investigated whether there were differences in rates of echocardiography and prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists and beta blockers.

We found that the number of cases was lower during the pandemic and there was a lower mortality rate that was not statistically significant. There was a higher proportion of new cases (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 3.94, p=0.008) and of female patients (OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.14 to 3.61, p=0.019). For survivors, there was a non-significant decrease in prescription rates for ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (81.6% vs. 71.4%, p=0.137) that was not seen for beta blockers. The length of stay was increased and there was also an increase in the interval between admission and echocardiography in patients who were newly diagnosed. Regardless of time period, the time before echocardiography was significantly associated with length of stay.

SARS-CoV-2 is an emerging cause of viral myocarditis that generates multiple complications, such as dilated cardiomyopathy. We describe a young, obese male patient with severe myocardial involvement by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, who presented with chest pain, elevated cardiac enzymes, non-specific electrocardiographic findings, echocardiogram with evidence of dilated heart disease with reduced ejection fraction, and subsequent verification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The results of the cardiac MRI were typical of viral myocarditis. The patient did not respond to a short course of systemic steroids and the standard management for heart failure, had multiple re-admissions, and, unfortunately, died.

The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a marker of advanced coronary atherosclerosis. Numerous prospective cohorts have validated CAC as an independent marker that improves prognostication in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond traditional risk factors. Accordingly, CAC is now incorporated into international cardiovascular guidelines as a tool to inform medical decision-making. Particular interest concerns the significance of zero CAC score (CAC=0). While many studies report CAC=0 to virtually exclude obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), non-negligible rates of obstructive CAD despite CAC=0 are reported in certain populations. Overall, the current literature supports the power of zero CAC as a strong downward risk classifier in older patients, whose CAD burden predominantly involves calcified plaque. However, with their higher burden of non-calcified plaque, CAC=0 does not reliably exclude obstructive CAD in patients under 40 years. Illustrating this point, we present a cautionary case of a 31-year-old patient found to have severe two-vessel CAD despite CAC=0. We highlight the value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as the gold-standard non-invasive imaging modality when the diagnosis of obstructive CAD is in question.

A retrospective study of 322 patient experiences of post-operative pain, short term and long term, following a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedure. Pain from pacemaker and ICD (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) implant surgery remains a problem both in terms of severity and longevity. There is a subset of patients receiving implants that have severe pain that may be of a long duration. Patient advice needs to be appropriate to these findings.

This study illustrates a need for better pain management by physicians, support, and realistic communication with their patients.

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), previously known as Propionibacterium acnes, is a rare cause of infective endocarditis (IE). We provide a review of the literature and describe two recent cases from a single centre to provide insight into the various clinical presentations, progression and management of patients with this infection.

The primary objective of our review is to highlight the difficulty in the initial assessment of these patients with an aim to improve the time and accuracy of diagnosis and expedite subsequent treatment. There are currently no guidelines in the literature specific to the management of IE caused by C. acnes. Our secondary objectives are to disseminate information about the indolent course of the disease and add to the growing body of evidence around this rare, yet complex, cause of IE.

High-output heart failure (HF) is an uncommon condition. This occurs when HF syndrome patients have a cardiac output higher than eight litres per minute. Shunts, such as fistulas and arteriovenous malformations are an important reversible cause. We present the case of a 30-year-old man who presented to the emergency department due to decompensated HF. Echocardiogram showed dilated myocardiopathy with high cardiac output (19.5 L/min calculated on long-axis view). He was diagnosed with arteriovenous malformation by computed tomography (CT) and subsequent angiography, and a multi-disciplinary team decided to perform endovascular embolisation with ethylene vinyl alcohol/dimethyl sulfoxide at different times. The transthoracic echocardiogram showed a significant decrease in cardiac output (9.8 L/min) and his general condition improved significantly.