June 2024 Br J Cardiol 2024;31:80 doi:10.5837/bjc.2024.024
Edd Maclean, Karishma Mahtani, Maurizio Parker, Rohan Vyas, Roy Bo Wang, Marina Roelas, Nikhil Ahluwalia, Vijayabharathy Kanthasamy, Antonio Creta, Malcolm Finlay, Ross J Hunter, Syed Ahsan, Mark J Earley, Pier D Lambiase, James Elliott, Filip Zemrak, Amal Muthumala, Philip Moore, Simon Sporton, Anthony Chow, Christopher Monkhouse
Introduction In ambulatory individuals with high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block, it is well-established that restoration of AV synchrony with dual-chamber pacing confers important physiological benefits over single-chamber pacing, including improvements in exercise capacity, reduction in incident atrial fibrillation (AF), and avoidance of pacemaker (PPM) syndrome.1,2 The impact of dual-chamber pacing on mortality remains disputed and, in older people, it has been proposed that the expected advantages of physiological pacing strategies may be mitigated by the higher prevalence of comorbidities and non-arrhythmic death.1,3 Accordingly, the
September 2020 Br J Cardiol 2020;27:100–1 doi:10.5837/bjc.2020.027
Mohsin Gondal, Ali Hussain
Case A 56-year-old man was referred from the emergency department for further evaluation of recurrent dizzy spells. The patient reported that he had intermittent episodes of palpitations associated with pre-syncope, but denied loss of consciousness. Additionally, he was feeling generally unwell and tired. There was no associated history of shortness of breath, chest pain, nausea, vomiting or sweating. Each episode of dizziness lasted for a few minutes and occurred both at rest and on exertion. There was no history of recent viral infection, tinnitus, otalgia, or otorrhoea. There was no associated facial asymmetry, speech disturbance or sensor
You need to be a member to print this page.
Find out more about our membership benefits
You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Find out more about our membership benefits