May 2022 Br J Cardiol 2022;29:64–6 doi:10.5837/bjc.2022.018
Mateusz Wawrzeńczyk, Marcin D Grabowski
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a serious threat to global health worldwide. In an acute disease process, which is the case in COVID-19, electrocardiography (ECG) abnormalities are common, present in up to 93% of hospitalised critically ill patients.1 Any specific ECG alteration criteria could help emergency clinicians establish the prognosis and assess the risk of adverse events resulting from coronavirus infection. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the prognostic value of the admission ECG (specifically: the duration of the PR interval, the QTc interval and the QRS complex and the heart rate [HR]) in COVID-19 pati
January 2019 Br J Cardiol 2019;26:19–22 doi:10.5837/bjc.2019.003
Varun Sharnam, Stelios Iacovides, Luisa Cleverdon, Wasing Taggu, Philip Keeling
Introduction Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are becoming more commonly recommended during the investigation of a patient with transient loss of consciousness.1,2 The original first-generation devices were implanted by a surgical procedure, usually by a cardiologist in a cardiac catheterisation theatre on a day-case basis, lasting up to 30–45 minutes per procedure. This process is inherently resource heavy for theatre time, staff (implanting physician, catheter lab nurses, cardiac radiographer and cardiac physiologist), in addition to pre-admission assessment, surgical equipment and patient recovery in a day-case facility. The developme
March 2018 doi:10.5837/bjc.2018.006
Anthony D Dimarco, Eunice N Onwordi, Conrad F Murphy, Emma J Walters, Lorraine Willis, Nicola J Mullan, Nicholas S Peters, Mark A Tanner
(more…)
February 2002 Br J Cardiol 2002;9:106-8
Khalid Mahmood, Daniel Higham
No content available
You need to be a member to print this page.
Find out more about our membership benefits
You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Find out more about our membership benefits