December 2025 Br J Cardiol 2025;32:148–51 doi:10.5837/bjc.2025.052
Peter L M Kerkhof, Rienzi A Diaz-Navarro, Neal Handly
Obscure origin of the ejection fraction metric Only rarely have investigators revealed the origins of the popular metric called ejection fraction (EF), while, for example, referring to William Harvey or to a psychiatrist.1 Recently, a position paper reported that in 1918 MacKenzie ‘measured’ EF using heart rate and pulse pressure.2 However, one thing is clear: a rigorously documented foundation is absent.3 Fact is that more than a century ago Bardeen directly calculated the ratio of left ventricular (LV) stroke volume (SV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV).4 Indeed, there is no single published paper that explains, in full detail, what the e
April 2025 Br J Cardiol 2025;32:77–80 doi:10.5837/bjc.2025.017
Ketut Angga Aditya Putra Pramana, Ni Gusti Ayu Made Sintya Dwi Cahyani, Yusra Pintaningrum
Introduction According to projections, coronary artery disease (CAD), which is brought on by the atherosclerotic process in coronary arteries, will continue to be the world’s leading cause of death and morbidity.1,2 The development of coronary lesions may increase the risk of mortality for patients by causing serious adverse cardiovascular events including acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In the treatment of CAD, reperfusion via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) combined with the placement of drug-eluting stents (DES) and fibrinolytics has considerably improved patient clinical results.1,2 Even while it significantly lessens post-infar
May 2024 Br J Cardiol 2024;31:45–8 doi:10.5837/bjc.2024.019
Rienzi A Diaz-Navarro, Peter L M Kerkhof
Figure 1A. Volume domain representation of data sets referring to acute myocardial infarction patients. End-systolic volume (ESV) is plotted against end-diastolic volume (EDV). The dark blue line indicates a trajectory with a constant value for ejection fraction (EF), in this case 45%. Four patients satisfy this condition, but can be distinguished by considering the distance from the origin to each individual point. This distance is termed the companion to EF, and denoted as EFC. An example (pink-arrowed bar) is shown for the patient with the smallest ventricle having EF=45%. Four patients (marked by the coloured dotted lines referring to th
May 2002 Br J Cardiol 2002;9:294-6
Matthew J Banks, Jane Flint, Peter R Forsey, George D Kitas
No content available
You need to be a member to print this page.
Find out more about our membership benefits
You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Find out more about our membership benefits