Multidisciplinary experts in heart failure care from across the UK and wider afield gathered for the recent 26th British Society of Heart Failure (BSH) annual meeting. This year’s programme sought to highlight how collaboration, coordination and cooperation would ultimately be vital for the delivery and success of the flagship 25in25 initiative. The meeting, held at the Queen Elizabeth II Centre, London, on 30th November and 1st December 2023, offered thought-provoking plenary sessions, focused masterclasses, a new ‘technology in action’ demonstration area, plus a number of high-quality poster presentations. Dr Aaron Henry reports highlights from the meeting.
25in25
The meeting began with an update on the 25in25 initiative from BSH Chair-Elect Dr Lisa Anderson (St George’s University Hospital, London). This national quality improvement initiative, led by the BSH in collaboration with over 54 national and international healthcare organisations, has the goal of reducing heart failure deaths by 25% over the next 25 years. With already over one million people in the UK living with heart failure, a number which is expected to double by 2040, the ambitious initiative is eagerly awaited. In the UK alone this could translate to over 10,000 lives saved per year.
A population health approach underpins the initiative, with an emphasis on national collaboration. The initial steps involve the implementation of fast-track communities (FTC), inspired by the HIV fast track cities model.1 This approach includes the creation of a dashboard to assess metrics across four key areas:
- Identification of those at risk of heart failure
- Accurate and timely diagnosis
- Guideline directed-medical therapy
- Quality of life and wellbeing
Table 1. British Society for Heart Failure ‘25in25’ fast track communities
Swansea |
Blackpool |
North West Anglia |
Birmingham |
Liverpool |
Jersey |
Glasgow |
Seven sites have been announced for the initiation of the FTC project (see table 1), which started in January 2024. The plan is to roll out the project nationally in 2025, with significant engagement from EU governments and international societies promising further expansion internationally.
Cardiometabolic clinics
Dr Mimi Chen (St George’s University Hospital, London), a Consultant Endocrinologist, shared experiences of developing a successful cardiometabolic clinic at St George’s. The significance of this clinic stems from the alarming global prevalence of diabetes – affecting one in 11 adults, and expected to rise to over 600 million by 2045.2 These patients are at a two- to three-fold increased risk of heart disease. Similarly, the prevalence of obesity, a recognised contributor to heart failure, is increasing with almost two-thirds of UK adults overweight or obese.3
This clinic adopts a multidisciplinary approach, integrating the expertise of a heart failure cardiologist, an endocrinologist, and a heart failure pharmacist. Its primary function is to address cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients who are living with diabetes or obesity. The clinic accepts referrals from within trust specialists, encompassing cardiology, metabolic, and surgical departments, as well as from community heart failure teams. Collaboration with other specialisms is a key feature of the clinic, involving sleep clinics, hepatology, bariatric surgery, community heart failure and lymphoedema teams. A large focus is placed on the American Heart Association’s (AHA) ‘Life’s Simple 7’4 prescription for cardiovascular health:
- Stop smoking
- Eat better
- Get active
- Lose weight
- Manage blood pressure
- Control cholesterol
- Reduce blood sugar
The clinic also emphasises the importance of early initiation of triple therapy for those with cardiovascular disease and ‘diabesity’—a combination of metformin, a sodium-glucose co-transport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, and a glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP-1) receptor agonist. There are, of course, challenges, including sick day rules, medication side-effect profiles, insulin adjustment, medication discontinuation, and the national shortage of GLP-1 receptor agonists. The clinic’s approach offers several advantages: it leverages multiple areas of expertise, reduces waiting times for cross-referral (shortening this period by at least six months), and promotes early intervention and admission avoidance. Looking forward, the clinic aims to expand its multidisciplinary team by including a nephrologist to evolve into a CardioRenalMetabolic clinic, enhancing its scope and efficacy in treating complex patients.
Obesity and heart failure
Professor Naveed Sattar (University of Glasgow) explained why heart failure specialists should know about obesity. It is strongly linked to heart failure. This is due to both increases in risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia but also a direct effect, which is much harder to measure and likely includes haemodynamic, cellular factors over nutrition and inflammatory mechanisms. Moreover, data from registries and genetic studies implicate obesity in having a causal role in the development of heart failure.5,6
It follows that treating obesity will reduce the likelihood of developing heart failure, and non-randomised studies of bariatric surgery have shown significant reductions in heart failure incidence following weight loss surgery.7 More recent studies have shone a light on targeting obesity in those living with heart failure. The STEP HFpEF (Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity) trial, presented at last year’s European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress, showed that the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide was associated with both a 13% decrease in body weight and a remarkable improvement in quality of life.8 Putting this improvement in symptoms into context, the results were significantly greater than those seen in trials investigating SGLT2 inhibitors or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).9 Outcome trials of weight loss therapies in heart failure are now eagerly awaited, especially with a suggestion of lower heart failure hospitalisations from the recently published SELECT (Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes) trial.10 Excitingly, new weight loss therapies are in development including a combined triple agonist (GLP-1, gastric inhibitory peptide [GIP] and glucagon), retatrutide, achieving weight loss similar to that seen in bariatric surgery.11
Philip Poole-Wilson Memorial Lecture
The 2023 Memorial Lecture was given by Professor John McMurray (University of Glasgow), who highlighted the significant advancements in heart failure treatment and understanding that have taken place over the past 15 years since the passing of Professor Poole-Wilson, the founding chair of the BSH.
He began by reflecting on the 2008 heart failure guidelines, where ACE inhibitors and beta blockers were the cornerstone treatments. He discussed the role of MRAs, citing RALES (Randomised Aldactone Evaluation Study),12 and the development of sacubitril/valsartan, emphasising its impact as revealed in the PARADIGM-HF (Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) study.13 Of course, a recent highlight has been the development of SGLT2 inhibitors which have shown benefit in heart failure irrespective of ejection fraction as evidenced in DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure),14 DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure),15 EMPEROR-Reduced (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction),16 and EMPEROR-Preserved (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction)17 trials.
Professor McMurray also outlined three fundamental shifts in the new 2023 update to the 2021 ESC guidelines for heart failure management:18
- The urgency of early treatment initiation, underscoring the importance of prompt action.
- The primacy of initiation of treatment over conventional dose titration, emphasising the importance of starting all four pillars of therapy.
- The flexibility in the order and sequence of medication administration, allowing for tailored patient care.
He also touched upon the development of chemically-engineered drugs like omecamtiv mecarbil19 and the ongoing efforts to understand the role of intravenous iron in heart failure, referencing the IRONMAN (Intravenous Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients with Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency in the UK)20 and HEART-FID (Ferric Carboxymaltose in Heart Failure with Iron Deficiency)21 studies. He also discussed the increasingly recognised importance of managing arrhythmias in heart failure, particularly atrial fibrillation, citing the CASTLE HF (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure)22 trial and the upcoming CRAAFT-HF and CABA-HFpEF studies.
Concluding his lecture, Professor McMurray discussed the exploration of new therapies in heart failure. This included more selective MRAs (FINEARTS-HF trial), the investigation into the role of inflammation in heart failure (HERMES trial), and the impact of obesity on heart failure, as highlighted in the STEP HFpEF and SUMMIT trials.
Natriuretic peptides
At this year’s meeting, the focus on natriuretic peptides (NPs) included discussions led by Professor Antonio Bayes-Genis (University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol de Badalona, Barcelona, Spain) and Dr Clare Taylor (University of Oxford). Professor Bayes-Genis introduced the ‘Peptide for Life’ initiative,23 which aims to standardise NP testing access in primary care and emergency departments across Europe. Endorsed by the ESC, this initiative emerged from the Heart Failure Association Atlas, highlighting the varied use of NPs in different regions. Its goal is to enhance early detection and management of heart failure through consistent and widespread use of NP testing.
Dr Taylor examined the use of NPs in UK primary care. She noted that heart failure patients diagnosed in the community have better survival rates than those diagnosed in hospitals, emphasising the importance of NP testing. Despite a 17-fold increase in NP testing from 2004 to 2018, the diagnosis rate has remained at about 10%, with the median NP level at diagnosis (around 1200 pg/ml for NT-proBNP) suggesting late-stage detection.24
She also addressed the debate on NP thresholds, comparing the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (<400 pg/ml NT-proBNP) and ESC (<125 pg/ml NT-proBNP) guidelines. Large GP datasets indicated a sensitivity of 82% at >400 pg/ml, missing roughly one in five heart failure cases, versus 95% sensitivity at >125 pg/ml.25 Lowering the threshold, however, raises concerns about overburdening cardiology services.
Dr Taylor also presented data linking NP levels at diagnosis to hospitalisation and mortality risks. Alarmingly, over 50% of patients were hospitalised within a year of diagnosis, with a median delay of 101 days between testing and diagnosis.26 High NT-proBNP levels (>2000 pg/ml) doubled the risk of hospitalisation and increased heart failure mortality by 50% at one, five, and 10 years, highlighting the need for prompt diagnosis and intervention.
Early Investigator Award
Three excellent candidates presented their work in the Early Investigator Award session. Dr Fardad Soltani (University of Manchester) presented work in phenogrouping HFpEF using electronic healthcare records and machine learning. Utilising the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Cardiovascular database from five hospital trusts, Dr Soltani analysed data from 2000 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%. This led to the identification of three distinct phenogroups (table 2). Notably, the third group was found to have a threefold risk of death, underscoring the potential of machine learning in enhancing our understanding of HFpEF.
Table 2. Early Investigator Award
Investigator | Location | Title | Take away message |
---|---|---|---|
Fardad Soltani | Manchester | Phenogrouping HFpEF using electronic health record data | Three phenogrpups identified
|
Ramesh Nadarajah | Leeds | Prediction of incident HF in community-based electronic health records: systematic review, meta-analysis and UK prediction model development and validation | There are a large number of models which predict five- and 10-year risk of HF but they have limited performance in predicting short- term HF. This model is scalable and accurately predicts both short- and long-term HF. |
Daniel Hammersley | London | Myocardial tissue remodelling in DCM in clinical remission | Remission of DCM phenotype was associated with regression of interstitial fibrosis and reduction of subclinical myocardial inflammation, but this could not be predicted. |
Key: AF = atrial fibrillation; CRP = C-reactive protein; DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy; HF = heart failure; HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
Dr Ramesh Nadarajah (University of Leeds) focused on predicting heart failure in community-based health records through a systematic review and meta-analysis of 59 prediction models. Although these models excelled in long-term (five and 10 year) predictions, their performance in short-term (within one year) diagnosis was variable and uncertain. Dr Nadarajah then worked on developing a novel decision support tool with high accuracy in both short- and long-term prediction, using a half-million patient derivation cohort and a nearly 100,000 patient validation cohort.
Lastly, Dr Daniel Hammersley (National Heart and Lung Institute, London) explored myocardial tissue remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The REMIT-DCM (Reverse Remodelling Markers In the Serial Evaluation of Recent-onset Dilated Cardiomyopathy) study, involving baseline, two to three months, and 12-month follow-ups with cardiac MRI and blood tests, found that 31% of patients experienced DCM remission. Interestingly, no baseline clinical or MRI parameters could predict 12-month remission. The study revealed that regression of myocardial fibrosis and reduction in subclinical myocardial inflammation were common in those who improved, suggesting these as potential therapeutic targets. It was also noted that replacement fibrosis does not preclude DCM remission.
Congratulations to all three early career investigators and especially to the winner Dr Nadarajah.
BSH Research Fellows
We also enjoyed an update from current BSH Research Fellows on their progress. Janine Beezer (South Tyneside and Sunderland Foundation Trust), Jo Bilak (University of Leicester), Elton Luo (Castle Hill Hospital, Hull) and Matthew Sadler (King’s College Hospital, London) all provided updates on their studies (table 3). Dr Simon Beggs (University of Glasgow), past BSH Research Fellow, also presented evidence on the RHYTHM-HF study. This study sought to inform on how arrhythmias contribute to death or rehospitalisation in heart failure patients. Patients were recruited during index hospitalisation for heart failure and received an injectable cardiac monitor. Dr Begg showed that in those with an adjudicated pump failure death, the cause of death may be due to an unidentified alternative pathology, such as a myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus, although this cannot be extrapolated from the terminal rhythm. Dr Begg also showed that adjudicated sudden cardiac deaths may be due to unidentified pathology including non-cardiac pathology, and these may be associated with a secondary ventricular arrhythmia. Again, the underlying cause of death could not be extrapolated from the terminal rhythm.
Table 3. BSH Research Fellows
BSH Research Fellow | Project |
---|---|
Janine Beezer | Polypharmacy in heart failure: investigating the relationship between treatment and outcomes – the POTION study |
Jo Bilak | A Multi-Ethnic, multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of a low-energy diet for improving functional status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – the AMEND-Preserved study |
Elton Luo | Study using two large primary care networks to identify patients on loop diuretics who are not on the heart failure registry |
Matthew Sadler | Role of clonal haematopoiesis (CHIP) in ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction |
Heart failure clinical trials update
An update on heart failure clinical trials (table 4) was given by Professor John Cleland (University of Glasgow). He also made the case for following the lead of our oncology colleagues, who aim to have 20% of their patients enrolled in clinical trials. This would equate to around 200,000 heart failure patients in the UK enrolled in a clinical trial.
Table 4. Update on heart failure clinical trials
Trials | Summary |
---|---|
Recently Completed | |
IRONMAN20 | IV iron appeared to lower the risk of HF hospitalisation in patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency |
REVIVED27 | PCI did not improve outcomes in patients with severe ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction |
Recruiting | |
HFpEF Registry28 | Redefining HFpEF into more distinct phenogroups using multiomics |
REACH-HFpEF29 | Investigating a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in HFpEF |
SUBCUT-HF II | Subcutaneous furosemide to enable early supported discharge in HF |
PROTECT-HF | Assessing ventricular pacing by right ventricle pacing vs conduction system pacing in patients with an LVEF >35% |
BRITISH30 | Effectiveness of an ICD/CRT-D in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF <35%) and scar present on CMR |
Funded | |
CONTEMP-ICD | ICD vs medical therapy alone in patients with HFrEF and LVEF <35% who have a lower risk of arrhythmic than non-arrhythmic death |
CRAAFT-HF | AF ablation in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF |
CORAL | Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of co-enzyme Q10 in patients with HFrEF |
SOPHIST | Sotagliflozin for HF and type 1 diabetes, assessing quality of life and safety |
CROSS-HF | Invasive or non-invasive imaging for coronary disease in patients with new HF |
STITCH3-BCIS431 | PCI or CABG in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction and multivessel disease |
Pilots | |
IDEAL-HF | Delaying ICD therapy in HFrEF patients medically optimised with an LVEF <35% until echo reassessment at 12 months |
THINK-HF | Feasibility trial of electronic health record ‘intelligent tooling’ in primary care for quicker diagnosis of HF |
Key: CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CRT-D = cardiac resynchronisation therapy – defibrillator; HF = heart failure; HFmrEF = heart failure with mildy reduced ejection fraction; HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; IV = intravenous; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention |
Acute heart failure – diuretics
Professor Andrew Clark (University of Hull) delivered an entertaining and insightful lecture on diuretic management in acute heart failure. He summarised trials conducted in acute heart failure and the evidence generated from these trials (table 5). Despite many decades of diuresing patients, there is still not a consensus on how diuretics should be used and what the goal of treatment should be. What is clear, however, is that congestion is a negative prognostic marker, and the more congestion you have the worse your outcome is likely to be. Professor Clark concluded by saying: “Patients rarely fail to respond to diuretics, but we commonly fail to prescribe enough diuretics”.
Table 5. Trials of diuretic therapy
Trial | Details | Summary |
---|---|---|
DOSE32 | AHF receiving either bolus (12 hourly) or infusion of either high (2.5 x home dose) or low (home) dose furosemide | No statistical difference in symptoms or kidney function across groups, but trend towards improved symptoms in high dose group |
CARESS-HF33 | AHF with cardiorenal syndrome, randomised to stepped pharmacological therapy or ultrafiltration | Ultrafiltration is associated with more adverse events, worsening renal function and no change in weight compared to medical therapy |
CLOROTIC-HCTZ34 | Addition of HCTZ to IV furosemide in patients with AHF | The addition of HCTZ to loop diuretic therapy improved diuretic response, worsened renal function without causing significant hyponatraemia or hypokalaemia |
ADVOR35 | Acetazolamide in addition to loop diuretics in AHF | The addition of acetazolamide for 3 days improves the proportion who achieved decongestion |
3T36 | Comparison of metolazone versus chlorothiazide versus tolvaptan in addition to furosemide in AHF | Good weight loss across groups with no significant difference between groups |
PUSH-HF37 | Does natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy improve outcomes in AHF | Measuring urinary sodium, with increased diuretic intensity if <70mmol/L, improved natriuresis and diuresis |
Key: AHF = acute heart failure; HCTZ = hydrochlorothiazide; IV = intravenous |
Ejection fraction – time to move on?
In the penultimate session of the meeting, attention turned to ejection fraction (EF) as a measure of left ventricular function. Dr Sarah Hudson (Wye Valley NHS Trust) opened the session with a history of EF, from its first use by Folse and Braunwald in 1962 to the first cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scan in 1985. Professor Chris Miller (University of Manchester) then discussed how imaging techniques such as CMR and computed tomography (CT) can provide a wealth of data beyond EF to further understand aetiology, prognosis and aid treatment. Dr Joe Cuthbert (University of Hull) however outlined how recent clinical trial evidence supports the use of EF to guide treatment, and therefore we would need a very good reason to move on from its use. It may be less important at certain times, such as acute presentation with congestion and end of life. Finally, Dr Fozia Ahmed (Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust) raised the important issue of sex-specific differences in cardiac structure and function, where females tend to have a higher normal EF (e.g. >60%). This is important as emerging evidence suggests women may benefit from neurohormonal blockade up to a higher EF. Further research is needed to investigate these sex-specific differences.
BSH diary dates
- 29th February 2024: Deadline for BSH Fellowship 2024–25 applications
- 25th–26th April 2024: BSH MDT meeting, Glasgow
- 21st–22nd November 2024: 27th Annual Meeting of the BSH, London
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
J. Aaron Henry
Cardiology Fellow, Jersey General Hospital
Visiting Researcher, University of Oxford
[email protected]
References
1. Duncombe C, Ravishankar S, Zuniga JM. Fast-Track Cities: striving to end urban HIV epidemics by 2030. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2019;14:503–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/coh.0000000000000583
2. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018;14:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151
3. Digital N. Health Survey for England. 2021. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2021
4. AHA. Life’s Simple 7. American Heart Association. 2020. https://playbook.heart.org/lifes-simple-7/
5. Robertson J, Lindgren M, Schaufelberger M, et al. Body mass index in young women and risk of cardiomyopathy: a long-term follow-up study in Sweden. Circulation 2020;141:520–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.119.044056
6. Larsson SC, Bäck M, Rees JMB, Mason AM, Burgess S. Body mass index and body composition in relation to 14 cardiovascular conditions in UK Biobank: a Mendelian randomization study. Eur Jeart J 2019;41:221–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz388
7. Liakopoulos V, Franzén S, Svensson A-M, Sattar N, et al. Renal and cardiovascular outcomes after weight loss from gastric bypass surgery in type 2 diabetes: cardiorenal risk reductions exceed atherosclerotic benefits. Diabetes Care 2020;43:1276–84. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1703
8. Kosiborod MN, Abildstrøm SZ, Borlaug BA, et al. Semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity. N Eng J Med 2023;389:1069–84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2306963
9. Verma S, Borlaug BA, Butler J, et al. A big STEP for treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Cell Metab 2023;35:1681–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2023.08.003
10. Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in obesity without diabetes. N Engl J Med 2023;389:2221–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307563
11. Jastreboff AM, Kaplan LM, Frías JP, et al. Triple–hormone-receptor agonist retatrutide for obesity — a phase 2 trial. N Engl J Med 2023;389:514–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2301972
12. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and Mmortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med 1999;341:709–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199909023411001
13. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014;371:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077
14. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1995–2008. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911303
15. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, et al. Dapagliflozin in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1089–98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206286
16. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1413–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022190
17. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1451–61. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107038
18. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2023;44:3627–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195
19. Teerlink JR, Diaz R, Felker GM, et al. Cardiac myosin activation with omecamtiv mecarbil in systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2021;384:105–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2025797
20. Kalra PR, Cleland JGF, Petrie MC, et al. Intravenous ferric derisomaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency in the UK (IRONMAN): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet 2022;400:2199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02083-9
21. Mentz RJ, Garg J, Rockhold FW, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose in heart failure with iron deficiency. N Engl J Med 2023;389:975–86. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2304968
22. Sohns C, Fox H, Marrouche NF, et al. Catheter ablation in end-stage heart failure with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1380–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2306037
23. Bayes-Genis A, Januzzi JL, Richards AM, et al. The ‘Peptide for Life’ Initiative: a call for action to provide equal access to the use of natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis of acute heart failure across Europe. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:1432–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2293
24. Roalfe AK, Lay-Flurrie SL, Ordóñez-Mena JM, et al. Long term trends in natriuretic peptide testing for heart failure in UK primary care: a cohort study. Eur Heart J 2021;43:881–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab781
25. Taylor CJ, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Lay-Flurrie SL, et al. Natriuretic peptide testing and heart failure diagnosis in primary care: diagnostic accuracy study. Br J Gen Prac 2023;73:e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2022.0278
26. Taylor CJ, Lay-Flurrie SL, Ordóñez-Mena JM, et al. Natriuretic peptide level at heart failure diagnosis and risk of hospitalisation and death in England 2004–2018. Heart 2022;108:543–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319196
27. Perera D, Clayton T, O’Kane PD, et al. Percutaneous revascularzation for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1351–60. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2206606
28. Group UHC. Rationale and design of the United Kingdom Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry. Heart 2023:heartjnl-2023-323049. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323049
29. Lang CC, Smith K, Wingham J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a facilitated home-based rehabilitation intervention in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregivers: the REACH-HFpEF Pilot Study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019649. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019649
30. Flett A, Cebula A, Nicholas Z, Adam R, et al. Rationale and study protocol for the BRITISH randomized trial (Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance identified scar as the benchmark risk indication tool for implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and severe systolic heart failure). Am Heart J 2023;266:149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.008
31. Fremes SE, Marquis-Gravel G, Gaudino MFL, et al. STICH3C: Rationale and study protocol. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:e012527. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.122.012527
32. Felker GM, Lee KL, Bull DA, et al. Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med 2011;364:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1005419
33. Bart BA, Goldsmith SR, Lee KL, et al. Ultrafiltration in decompensated heart failure with cardiorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2296–2304. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1210357
34. Trullàs JC, Morales-Rull JL, Casado J, et al. Combining loop with thiazide diuretics for decompensated heart failure: the CLOROTIC trial. Eur Heart J 2023;44:411–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac689
35. Mullens W, Dauw J, Martens P, et al. Acetazolamide in acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1185–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2203094
36. Cox ZL, Hung R, Lenihan DJ, Testani JM. Diuretic strategies for loop diuretic resistance in acute heart failure. JACC: Heart Fail 2020;8:157–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.012
37. ter Maaten JM, Beldhuis IE, van der Meer P, et al. Natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: a pragmatic randomized trial. Nature Med 2023;29:2625–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02532-z