Clinical articles

This article won first prize in the recent British Junior Cardiologists’ Association (BJCA) essay competition.

Though a rare condition, acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality; hence, timely diagnosis and surgery are important to reduce the risk of mortality. If the dissection extends into the aortic arch branches, ensuring adequate cerebral perfusion during surgery is crucial to preventing stroke.

A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department with symptoms of acute chest pain, dizziness, and headache. His blood pressure was 180/110 mmHg and heart rate was 100 bpm. He had a high blood pressure and heart rate and was initially treated with glyceryl trinitrate. Initial investigations ruled out acute coronary syndrome. Further investigations revealed ATAAD with the involvement of arch branches, an incomplete (open) circle of Willis and cerebral malperfusion. He was prepared for a branch-first total aortic arch replacement. Due to the high risk of stroke in this patient, off-pump axillo-axillary bypass (adaptive perfusion technique) was used to ensure bihemispheric cerebral perfusion throughout the surgery. The surgery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 12 days later. Postoperative follow-up at six months was normal.

In conclusion, ATAAD is a surgical emergency that can mimic other acute thoracic conditions, such as pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome; therefore, a judicious approach should be applied in the diagnosis and early management of symptoms. The reconstruction technique should be tailored to the patient’s needs; as this patient had a poorly functioning circle of Willis and cerebral hypoperfusion, continuous bilateral cerebral perfusion was essential to prevent irreversible cerebral ischaemic insult. The adaptive technique is easy to learn for surgeons who are already proficient in aortic dissection procedures, it is reproducible and requires only minor changes to the surgical setup without any substantial increase in operative time. Adoption of this technique in other surgical centres could be beneficial in increasing the success rate for the treatment of ATAAD.

In heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) requiring a pacemaker, biventricular cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is preferred to right ventricular (RV) pacing. Moreover, HFrEF patients who already have a conventional pacemaker in situ should be considered for CRT ‘upgrade’ in the presence of worsening symptoms and a significant proportion of RV pacing. While international guidelines are clearly defined, the ‘real-world’ prevalence of upgrading to CRT in patients with a significant proportion of RV pacing remains unclear. We aim to report the prevalence and characteristics of CRT upgrades in a UK district general hospital over a 10-year period.

We performed a retrospective univariate analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent pacemaker implantation for Mobitz type 2 and complete atrioventricular (AV) block from January 2009 to December 2018. Over the study period, 34 patients were upgraded to CRT (prevalence 4.6%). Male patients were more likely to receive CRT upgrade (p=0.027). There was no statistically significant difference in RV-pacing burden or RV-paced QRS duration between CRT upgrade and non-upgrade groups. Patients who received CRT had lower baseline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction than the non-upgrade group (50% vs. 60%, p=0.049).

In conclusion, this real-world study supports the notion that patients with impaired LV function and likely high requirements for RV pacing should be informed of the possible future need for device CRT upgrade. CRT should be considered upfront in selected patients with lower baseline LV systolic function.

Retinal ischaemic perivascular lesions (RIPL) are characterised on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) as focal thinning of the inner nuclear layer (INL) associated with outer nuclear layer (ONL) upward expansion. We present a small case series of 11 patients and reviewed all relevant original research on RIPL and its association with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). All 11 patients had RIPL incidentally identified on SD-OCT by two consultant ophthalmologists during a routine medical retina clinic. We obtained a thorough medical history to identify risk factors and CVD. The most common risk factor was type 2 diabetes mellitus (90.9%), followed by hypertension (81.9%). A diagnosis of arrhythmia was determined in 36.4% patients, coronary artery disease in 27.3%, cerebrovascular events in 36.4%, peripheral vascular disease in 27.3% and carotid artery stenosis in 8.3%. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus, using all relevant key words. Seven pieces of original research were described in the literature. Six of these described a RIPL prevalence ranging from 34.62% to 91%. One paper described a case series with an incidence of 72.7% new diagnosis of CVD in their cohort who were identified to have RIPLs. The ophthalmologists’ role in detecting RIPLs could be used to assess cardiovascular risk status, supporting a multi-disciplinary approach in managing CVD.

Wellens’ syndrome, characterised by specific T-wave changes on electrocardiogram (ECG), indicates critical proximal left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis and high acute myocardial infarction risk. While revascularisation is the standard treatment, it may be unsuitable for elderly patients with comorbidities. We present a case of successful medical management of Wellens’ syndrome type B in a 94-year-old woman deemed unfit for invasive interventions. The patient was treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, high-intensity statin, and anti-anginal medications. Symptom control was achieved, and serial ECGs and cardiac biomarkers remained stable. This case demonstrates that aggressive medical management can be a viable alternative in elderly patients with Wellens’ syndrome type B, unsuitable for invasive procedures.

Heart failure (HF) is a significant problem in the UK with variation in services across the country. Here we describe the findings from a cross-sectional survey of HF services in the UK performed between September 2021 and February 2022.

Seventy-nine responses describing hospital-based HF services from all devolved countries were received. The clinical lead in 82% of hospitals was a cardiologist with specialist interest in HF. Just over half of HF hospital services had a one-stop diagnostic clinic with a median of two clinics per week. A two-week pathway and six-week pathway were present in 78.5% and 75%, respectively. Only 4% of services met referral waiting time targets 100%, and 15% never met targets. The majority of inpatient HF services reviewed patients with primary (96%) or secondary (89%) admission for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), corresponding percentages for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) were 68% and 51%, respectively. HF services reported a median of two HF consultant cardiologists, five non-HF consultant cardiologists, one palliative care consultant, two band seven and one band six HF specialist nurses.

In conclusion, considerable variation in hospital-based HF services across the UK exist, which may not meet the needs of patients.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of global mortality, necessitating extensive research efforts. In Scotland, the NHS Research Scotland (NRS) Cardiovascular Network plays a pivotal role in coordinating cardiovascular research. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is crucial for shaping meaningful research strategies, yet barriers to such engagement persist.

We organised a hybrid PPI event, bringing together patients, researchers, and stakeholders. Interactive sessions explored barriers and enablers of PPI. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected, focusing on communication, commitment, and value as key themes.

Participants highlighted communication challenges, emphasising the need for clear, accessible information about research involvement. Commitment barriers included costs, travel, and time constraints. Feeling valued as research participants was essential, emphasising recognition of diverse experiences. Running the event as a hybrid facilitated broader participation, employing professional notetakers, British sign language (BSL) interpreters, and moderators.

In conclusion, holding this event emphasised the importance of PPI in cardiovascular research, outlining communication, commitment, and value as key facets. Hybrid events enhance inclusivity but demand careful planning. Meaningful PPI, as exemplified in this study, informs and enhances research quality, underscoring the need for continued investment in patient involvement initiatives.

Previous studies have shown mixed results comparing short-term mortality in patients undergoing urgent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Urg-TAVI) compared with elective procedures (El-TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). This study aimed to explore the predictors of requirement for Urg-TAVI versus El-TAVI, as well as compare differences in short- and intermediate-term mortality.

This single-centre, retrospective cohort study investigated 358 patients over three years. Baseline demographic data were collected for patients undergoing elective and urgent procedures, and mortality outcomes at one-month, one-year and three-year follow-up were compared.

Urg-TAVI was required in 131 (36.6%) patients. Patients undergoing Urg-TAVI were significantly more likely to be female, have poor left ventricular (LV) function, with higher baseline creatinine and higher clinical frailty score (CFS). Higher rates of vascular complications were independently associated with increased mortality at one month. Mortality at one year was associated with higher creatinine level (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.01, p=0.0013) and an urgent procedure (OR 2.25, 95%CI 1.28 to 3.97, p=0.0048). There remained a higher mortality in the urgent patients at three-year follow-up.

In conclusion, undergoing TAVI urgently did not have a statistically significant effect on 30-day mortality. However, over long-term follow-up of one year, it was associated with worse mortality than elective TAVI, and this persisted out to three years.

Fabry disease (FD), resulting from alpha-galactosidase A enzyme deficiency, remains underdiagnosed despite readily available methods for diagnosis. This multi-centre prospective survey across six tertiary centres aimed to determine the level of consideration of FD in patients presenting with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). LVH was defined according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) for the management of cardiomyopathies, where LVH is diagnosed if the left ventricular wall thickness exceeds 15 mm in any segment or exceeds 13 mm in the presence of a known diagnosis in a first-degree relative. Of 143 patients surveyed, only three with LVH underwent diagnostic testing for FD, all testing negative. Moreover, 44% of patients with LVH had an ambiguous aetiology, highlighting possible missed FD diagnostic opportunities. A discrepancy was observed between electrocardiogram (ECG) results and echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in diagnosing LVH, emphasising the need for comprehensive cardiac imaging. This project highlights the urgent requirement to amplify FD awareness, especially in patients with LVH, to ensure early intervention and better patient outcomes.

This study aimed to understand the national echocardiography assessment pathway in heart donation. We carried out a prospective national specialist nurses in organ donation (SNOD) audit of UK donor offers between 20 August and 31 November 2022, and a prospective national recipient transplant centre audit of all donor offers between 22 September and 19 December 2022.

The SNOD audit identified median time delay between requesting and performing an echocardiogram of 17.9 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 13.9–33.2). The staff group performing the echo were a cardiac physiologist in 57% (17/30) of cases and a medical doctor in 43% (13/30) of cases. Only 30% (9/30) of providers held comprehensive accreditation, 13% (4/30) were focused accredited, 33% (10/30) had no accreditation, and 23% (7/30) were unknown. Only 50% (15/30) of images were transferred for review to the transplant centre. Images were transferred via email (10/15, 67%), WhatsApp (4/15, 27%) and a standard picture archiving system (PACS) (1/15, 3%).

The transplant centre audit revealed that in 21% of donors, the transplant team felt that the echo performed at the referring centre contained inadequate information, and in 11% of donors, no echo was performed at all. Only 52% of potential donors had echo images available for direct review by the transplant centre. In 17% of cases, the transplant team felt that if good quality echo data and imaging had been available, the decision regarding mobilising the retrieval team may have been altered.

In conclusion, to improve donor heart utilisation rates we believe there is a need to recognise the contribution of focused echo and improve guidance for echo image acquisition. There is also a need for a robust system for image transfer to transplant centres.