Advertisement
For UK healthcare professionals only
July 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:(3) doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.024 Online First
Lisa Leung, Aerakondal B Gopalamurugan
(more…)
May 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22(suppl 1):S2–S15 doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.s01
Dr J Simon R Gibbs, Dr J Gerry Coghlan, Dr David G Kiely, Dr S John Wort
(more…)
February 2014 Br J Cardiol 2014;21:7–8 doi:10.5837/bjc.2014.001 Online First
Thomas Green, John Baxter, Sam McClure
The study The research is presented as a retrospective case-control study in the modern era of coronary intervention, and gives some insight into current practice. Data from 100 randomly selected patients aged over 80 years and a control group aged below 70 years were taken from a district general hospital (DGH) DCA database. This method of patient selection is perhaps the major weakness of the study. There will inevitably have been a high degree of case selection – particularly of older patients – with those put forward deemed appropriate for DCA (and by implication also considered ‘reasonable’ candidates for revascularisation). The
May 2009 Br J Cardiol 2009;16:137–40
Olga Gillane, Michael Pollard
(more…)
March 2002 Br J Cardiol 2002;9:
Peter F Ludman
No content available
For healthcare professionals only
You need to be a member to print this page.
Find out more about our membership benefits
You need to be a member to download PDF's.
Find out more about our membership benefits