December 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:155 doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.041
Thabo Mahendiran, Oliver E Gosling, Judith Newton, Dawn Giblett, Dan McKenzie, Mark Dayer
Abstract
(more…)
|
Full text
October 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:160 doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.037
David Mantle
Abstract
(more…)
|
Full text
October 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:138–142
BJCardio Staff
Abstract
(more…)
|
Full text
July 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:(3) doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.023 Online First
Laura Styles, Sarah Soar, Philippe Wheeler, Abdallah Al-Mohammad
Abstract
The three trainees and their supervisor. From left to right: Dr Sarah Soar, Dr Philippe Wheeler,Dr Laura Styles and Dr Abdallah Al-Mohammad
Introduction
For newly qualified doctors, the Foundation Programme provides a stimulating and exciting entry into a career in medicine. As the name suggests, doctors work within a range of specialties and environments in order to build on the knowledge learnt at medical school, and develop as a clinician in preparation for specialty training. We had the privilege of being the first to work as foundation doctors in a new role – FY1 in heart failure – and, in this article, we hope to outline some of the
|
Full text
April 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:(2) doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.014 Online First
Stephen Westaby
Abstract
Professor Stephen Westaby
NICE’s medical therapy is excellent, until the end game, but drugs alone have limitations.5 Inotropes worsen ischaemia, while vasopressors elevate afterload. Injured myocardium needs rest to promote recovery, not a flogging.6 Consider two real patients. A 21-year-old female with ion-channelopathy is admitted to a tertiary care centre. After 75 DC shocks and cardiac massage she is in shock. She needs extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circulatory support but cannot be transferred.6 She dies. A 56-year-old male with ischaemic cardiomyopathy suffers acute on chronic heart failure. Renal impairment and pulmonar
|
Full text
March 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:26 doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.008
Yasmin Ismail, Kate Shorthose, Angus K Nightingale
Abstract
Introduction
Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome and is the only cardiovascular disease that is increasing in prevalence.1 It has a profound impact on both the patient’s quality of life and functional capacity, as well as causing premature death.2 Traditionally, cancer patients have been the main focus for specialist palliative care services, though it is increasingly well-recognised that chronic heart failure is equivalent to malignant disease,3 with patients experiencing debilitating physical symptoms, as well as psychosocial and spiritual problems. Despite the growing recognition of the palliative care needs of this complex gr
|
Full text
March 2015 Br J Cardiol 2015;22:10–11 doi:10.5837/bjc.2015.007
Miriam J Johnson
Abstract
Professor Miriam J Johnson
Overcoming barriers
The misunderstanding that palliative care is only for those in the last few days or weeks of life, only to be implemented once all other options are gone and irreversible deterioration is certain, forms a major barrier to access to palliative care. Attempts to identify a prognostic tool to identify when palliative care should be employed have failed, and the consensus is that a problem-based approach is more fit for purpose.11–12 Such a model would enable the “concerns of today” facing the patient to be addressed in the context of the management options appropriate at their stage of disease
|
Full text
December 2014 Br J Cardiol 2014;21:IBC
Dr Andrew Creamer
Abstract
Publisher: British Journal of Cardiology, 2014
Available from: https://bjcardio.co.uk/learning
In September 2014 the online learning section of the British Journal of Cardiology website released a six-part series of learning modules covering heart failure. As a core medical trainee, I found that theoretical knowledge did not always translate into clinical practice and, prompted by my educational supervisor (the trust heart failure lead), I undertook the online modules to gain further insight when managing complex patients on the wards. The content of each module and continuing professional development (CPD) points allocated is outlined in ta
|
Full text
December 2014 Br J Cardiol 2014;21:147–52 doi:10.5837/bjc.2014.035
Anna Kate Barton, Stephanie H Rich, Keith A A Fox
Abstract
Introduction
For patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who survive to reach hospital, the majority of mortality and morbidity over the following five years occurs after discharge.1 Of all complications, development of acute heart failure (AHF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are key determinants of adverse outcome. Approximately half of patients with ACS are readmitted to hospital, constituting a profound burden on healthcare resources.1 In several healthcare systems there are financial penalties when ACS patients are readmitted within 30 days.2 Prediction of the development of AHF and hospital readmission following ACS
|
Full text
June 2014 Br J Cardiol 2014;21:72–4 doi:10.5837/bjc.2014.016
Thanh T Phan, Muhammad Awan, Dave Williams, Simon James, Andrew Thornley, Andrew G C Sutton, Mark de Belder, Nicholas J Linker, Andrew J Turley
Abstract
Introduction
Occupational radiation doses in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures are highest among medical staff using X-rays, particularly cardiologists involved in interventional procedures.1 The danger of radiation, such as radiation-induced cataracts in operators,2 has led to a significant focus on radiation safety in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Garments, lead goggles, skull caps, ceiling suspended shields, curtains under the table, and other protective equipment, provide a significant reduction in occupational doses.3 It is necessary for cardiologists to wear personal dosimeters during procedures for personal safety
|
Full text